[Speaker 1]

Each speaker will now be given 10 minutes for responses. Professor Kleiman, you may start when you wish.

[Speaker 2]

Okay, just sit back for a minute and then I'll start. Yeah, sure, why not? The one question that I think I can respond to um is Can you have your libertarian commune in a Marxist society? I would never call a society a Marxist society. It's not a society that runs according to the vision of some dead guy.

That's a misnomer. But let's talk about a communal society with individual property, but not private property, where people freely associate. Socialism. Can you have a libertarian? and on Twitter.

There's no problem. You do your thing, we do our thing. What's the problem? And if you remember, I even concluded by saying you want to advocate in a system where people do have individual property, that they relinquish that and sell themselves to the highest bidder or whatever. You want to advocate for that, that's fine.

But if you want to have a different society, you go establish a different society. You go pick berries. I think this is actually completely wrong.

What I'm saying I think is completely consonant with the ethics of libertarianism as I understand it. You do your thing, we do our thing. You don't want to be part of our society? You're not part of our society. You go establish your own society. I don't see the problem there. And free speech within our society? Yeah, I don't see any problem with that either. I'm all for that. I mean, I think free speech is really important.